California Prop 65 Lead Ceramics Leachable Limit

In 2001 a private plaintiff not the state of california initiated the first of hundreds of proposition 65 allegations related to alleged exposure to lead and later cadmium from.

California prop 65 lead ceramics leachable limit. Hazardous chemicals like lead. Why is proposition 65 an issue for the glass and ceramic industry now. Since its enactment there have been numerous lawsuits which resulted in the reduction of carcinogenic and reproductive chemicals by reformulation of consumer. Ceramic ceramic ceramic fda lead cadmium limits do not apply to glass but do apply to ceramic ware and others.

If a consumer performs a test and finds the pottery contains leachable lead the fda strongly advises against using the pottery for cooking serving or storing food or drinks. Four of the five ceramic spoons tested released lead above 7 ppm. A number of prop 65 settlement agreements involving lead have been reached for a variety of products. Proposition 65 standards for lead in dishes are much stricter than the fda standards.

None of the cups tested released lead which exceeded the safety limit of 5 ppm. Many of these allow a prop 65 warning label as an alternative. California proposition 65 compliance requirements compliance limits continued ceramic tableware vessel class lead compliance limits cadmium compliance limits us fda prop 65 us fda prop 65 flatware depth 25 mm 3 0 ppm 0 226 ppm 0 50 ppm 3 164 ppm small hollowware 1 1 liters 2 0 ppm 0 100 ppm 0 50 ppm 0 189 ppm extractable lead and. Proposition 65 does not ban any tableware from sale.

California proposition 65 prop 65 is the safe drinking water and toxic enforcement act of 1986 a ballot initiative passed overwhelmingly by california residents in november 1986. A yellow triangle and a warning message must be placed on or next to. Overall 54 7 of the samples tested exceeded the fda safety limits. Only one bowl released more than 5 ppm.

It does require that a warning be posted if dishware leaches more lead than proposition 65 allows. Registration of manufacturers and importers with cdhs required. Under proposition 65 the safe drinking water and toxic enforcement act of 1986 california health safety code 25249 5 et seq alleging that settling defendant violated proposition 65 by exposing persons to lead contained in gloves without first providing a clear and reasonable proposition 65 warning. Safe harbor levels which include no significant risk levels nsrls for cancer causing chemicals and maximum allowable dose levels madls for chemicals causing reproductive toxicity have been established for many of the chemicals listed under proposition 65.

The glazed earth enware pots did not leach out detectable amounts of lead.