Carbon Ceramic Vs Steel Brakes Stopping Distanc
This composite construction offers lighter stronger and more durable disks than their steel counterparts.
Carbon ceramic vs steel brakes stopping distanc. He very positively stated that changing to steel brakes would result in braking distances 5 times as long as with the current carbon carbon brakes. Carbon ceramic brakes on the other hand are virtually immune to corrosion. And it s this 3 way blitz where carbon ceramics shine over steel. Page 1 of 2 carbon vs steel brakes posted in the technical forum archive.
Cons of ceramic brake pads. Ceramic brake pads also have fine copper fibers embedded within them to help increase their friction and heat conductivity. This is because the material they re made from is much less reactive than steel and iron due to the material s tightly bonded structure. If you are driving a big vehicle like a truck or suv then you shouldn t use.
These brake pads are made from ceramic very similar to the type of ceramic used to make pottery and plates but is denser and a lot more durable. Ceramic brake pads cost more money than metallic brake pads. I have read several times that the gap is less then 2 to 1. Since they don t cause as much friction against the spinning brake discs the ability to slow down or stop the vehicle will take a little longer with ceramic brake pads.
Finally carbon ceramic brakes are much cleaner and quieter than conventional steel brakes. Other high performance vehicles like the audi r8 nissan gt r and even dodge s old viper aren t equipped with carbon ceramic brakes and can stop as fast or faster than vehicles with the.