Floor And Ceiling Effects Statistics
There is very little variance because the floor of your test is too high.
Floor and ceiling effects statistics. Let s talk about floor and ceiling effects for a minute. Usually this is because of inherent weaknesses in the measuring devices or the measurement scoring system. Limited variability in the data gathered on one variable may reduce the power of statistics on correlations between that variable and another variable. The other scale attenuation effect is the ceiling effect floor effects are occasionally encountered in psychological testing.
In statistics a floor effect also known as a basement effect arises when a data gathering instrument has a lower limit to the data values it can reliably specify. For example the distribution of scores on an ability test will be skewed by a floor effect if the test is much too difficult for many of the respondents and many of them obtain zero scores. If the floor or ceiling effects cause your data to become dichotomous or can easily be collapsed into two categories without much loss of information and you want to predict that variable then. In research a floor effect aka basement effect is when measurements of the dependent variable the variable exposed to the independent variable and then measured result in very low scores on the measurement scale.
The floor effect is what happens when there is an artificial lower limit below which data levels can t be measured. A floor effect is when most of your subjects score near the bottom. This is even more of a problem with multiple choice tests. This could be hiding a possible effect of the independent variable the variable being manipulated.
Ceiling effects and floor effects both limit the range of data reported by the instrument reducing variability in the gathered data. In layperson terms your questions are too hard for the group you are testing. A ceiling effect can occur with questionnaires standardized tests or other measurements used in research studies. In statistics and measurement theory an artificial lower limit on the value that a variable can attain causing the distribution of scores to be skewed.
The ceiling and flooring effects were calculated by percentage frequency of lowest or highest possible score achieved by respondents.